Landsat Time Series Reconstruction Using a Closed-Form Continuous Neural Network in the Canadian Prairies Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Landsat archive stands as one of the most critical datasets for studying landscape change, offering over 50 years of imagery. This invaluable historical record facilitates the monitoring of land cover and land use changes, helping to detect trends in and the dynamics of the Earth's system. However, the relatively low temporal frequency and irregular clear-sky observations of Landsat data pose significant challenges for multi-temporal analysis. To address these challenges, this research explores the application of a closed-form continuous-depth neural network (CFC) integrated within a recurrent neural network (RNN) called CFC-mmRNN for reconstructing historical Landsat time series in the Canadian Prairies region from 1985 to present. The CFC method was evaluated against the continuous change detection (CCD) method, widely used for Landsat time series reconstruction and change detection. The findings indicate that the CFC method significantly outperforms CCD across all spectral bands, achieving higher accuracy with improvements ranging from 33% to 42% and providing more accurate dense time series reconstructions. The CFC approach excels in handling the irregular and sparse time series characteristic of Landsat data, offering improvements in capturing complex temporal patterns. This study underscores the potential of leveraging advanced deep learning techniques like CFC to enhance the quality of reconstructed satellite imagery, thus supporting a wide range of remote sensing (RS) applications. Furthermore, this work opens up avenues for further optimization and application of CFC in higher-density time series datasets such as MODIS and Sentinel-2, paving the way for improved environmental monitoring and forecasting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".