Structural Characterization of Dimeric Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acid Using Experimental and Theoretical Ion Mobility Spectrometry Analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are contaminants of increasing concern, with over seven million compounds currently inventoried in the PubChem PFAS Tree. Recently, ion mobility spectrometry has been combined with liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-IMS-HRMS) to assess PFAS. Interestingly, using negative electrospray ionization, perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) form homodimers ([2M-H] − ), a phenomenon observed with trapped, traveling wave, and drift-tube IMS. In addition to the limited research on their effect on analytical performance, there is little information on the conformations these dimers can adopt. This study aimed to propose most probable conformations for PFCA dimers. Based on qualitative analysis of how collision cross section (CCS) values change with the mass-to-charge ratio ( m / z ) of PFCA ions, the PFCA dimers were hypothesized to likely adopt a V-shaped structure. To support this assumption, in silico geometry optimizations were performed to generate a set of conformers for each possible dimer. A CCS value was then calculated for each conformer using the trajectory method with Lennard-Jones and ion-quadrupole potentials. Among these conformers, at least one of the ten lowest-energy conformers identified for each dimer exhibited theoretical CCS values within a ±2% error margin compared to the experimental data, qualifying them as plausible structures for the dimers. Our findings revealed that the fluorinated alkyl chains in the dimers are close to each other due to a combination of C–F···O=C and C–F···F–C stabilizing interactions. These findings, together with supplementary investigations involving environmentally relevant cations, may offer valuable insights into the interactions and environmental behavior of PFAS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".