Bibliographic record
Abstract
The post-dictatorship (1985–2000) Uruguayan culture placed the issue of historical and political memory at the center of its collective imaginary. In this context, musical humor emerged as a tool for musicians to assimilate, criticize, and navigate the period. With that in mind, this research aims to analyze the (de)construction and reinterpretation of Uruguayan historical narratives through musical humor in the post-dictatorship period. It examines three songs from the rock band Cuarteto de Nos: ‘El Día que Artigas se Emborrachó’, ‘Tabaré, That’s Right’ and ‘No Somos Latinos’. The analysis focuses mainly on musical elements that refer to ideas, discourses, and stereotypes about Uruguayan culture and other places in Latin America, which interact with the musical elements to generate humor. The inquiry follows three key axes of Uruguayan national identity based on different areas and ideas about uruguayidad, the de-sacralization of relevant characters in the history of Uruguay, and the play with their masculinity/hypermasculinity/femininity. Together, these aspects speak of a society where national myths are no longer enough to sustain the country’s identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".