MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408211548 · doi:10.36040/pawon.v9i01.11316

PENAFSIRAN TRAGEDI PADA RANCANGAN MUSEUM TRAGEDI KANJURUHAN MELALUI ARSITEKTUR DEKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA DANIEL LIBERSKIND

2025· article· id· W4408211548 on OpenAlexaff
Komang Ayu Laksmi Harshinta Sari, Renaldy Putera Liano, Gaguk Sukowiyono

Bibliographic record

VenuePawon Jurnal Arsitektur · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manusia yang menciptakan sebuah tempat tinggal tanpa ada citra atau esensi, apakah sama seperti Binatang yang dapat membuat sarang untuk tempat berlindung. Arsitektur merupakan seni dalam merancang dan membangun struktur bangunan. Kata arsitektur sendiri berasal dari bahasa Yunani, yaitu "archee" dan "tectoon." "archee" berarti yang utama, asli, sementara "tectoon" berarti stabil, tidak roboh, atau kokoh. Arsitektur bukan hanya membangun tetapi menciptakan serta menjawab suatu permasalahan. Tragedi merupakan kata dengan konotasi yang negatif, apakah seorang arsitek dapat mentermahkan sebuah tragedi menjadi ide yang orisinil dan hasil yang kokoh sebagai rancangan bangunan. Paradigma Daniel Liberskind akan menjadi acuan untuk mendapatkan kriteria rancangan dari Museum Tragedi Kanjuruhan, menterjemahkan sebuah tragedi menampung memori dari korban tragedi serta bagaimana arsitektur berempati pada Tragedi Kanjuruhan, dengan metode berbasis konsep dari Philip D. Plowright yang akan mereduksi sumber menuju lingkup arsitektur. Pada rancangan berbasis penelitian ini semoga memberikan warna, watak dan paradigma baru pada pengembangan arsitektur yang ada di Indonesia serta menjadi pandangan baru dalam merespon sebuah tragedi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePawon Jurnal ArsitekturSame topicArchitectural and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207