MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408212768 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452969

TESS and HARPS-N unveil two planets transiting TOI-1453

2025· article· en· W4408212768 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Stalport, A. Mortier, M. Cretignier, J.A. Egger, L. Malavolta, D. W. Latham, K.A. Collins, Cristilyn N. Watkins, F. Murgas, Lars A. Buchhave, M. López-Morales, S. Udry, S.N. Quinn, G. Andreuzzi, David Baker, W. Boschin, D.R. Ciardi, M. Damasso, L. Di Fabrizio, X. Dumusque, A. Fukui, R. D. Haywood, S. B. Howell, J.M. Jenkins, A. Leleu, Pablo Lewin, J. Lillo-Box, A. Martinez Fiorenzano, N. Narita, M. Pedani, M. Pinamonti, E. Poretti, R.P. Schwarz, S. Seager, A. Sozzetti, E.B. Ting, A. Vanderburg, J. N. Winn, C. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of St AndrewsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryAmes Research CenterUniversité de GenèveNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience Mission DirectorateIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNational Science FoundationUK Research and InnovationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningHarvard UniversityQueen's UniversityPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionQueen's University BelfastScottish Universities Physics AllianceSpace Telescope Science InstituteEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetAstrophysicsAstronomyEarth (classical element)AstrobiologySuper-EarthPlanetary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. The TESS mission is searching for transiting planets over the entire sky, including two continuous viewing zones. Data from the continuous viewing zones span a long time baseline and offer ideal conditions for precise planet radius estimations, enabling the community to prepare for the PLATO mission. Aims. We report on the validation and characterisation of two transiting planets around TOI-1453, a K-dwarf star in the TESS northern continuous viewing zone. Methods. In addition to the TESS data, we used ground-based photometric, spectroscopic, and high-resolution imaging follow-up observations to validate the two planets. We obtained 100 HARPS-N high-resolution spectra over two seasons and used them together with the TESS light curve to constrain the mass, radius, and orbit of each planet. Results. TOI-1453 b is a super-Earth with an orbital period of Pb=4.314 days, a radius of Rb=1.17±0.06R⊕, and a mass lower than 2.32 M⊕ (99%). TOI-1453 c is a sub-Neptune with a period of Pc =6.589 days, radius of Rc=2.22±0.09 R⊕, and mass of Mc=2.95−0.84+0.83 M⊕. The two planets orbit TOI-1453 with a period ratio close to 3/2, although they are not in a mean motion resonance (MMR) state. We did not detect any transit timing variations in our attempt to further constrain the planet masses. TOI-1453 c has a very low bulk density and is one of the least massive sub-Neptunes discovered to date. It is compatible with having either a water-rich composition or a rocky core surrounded by a thick H/He atmosphere. However, we set constraints on the water mass fraction in the envelope according to either a water-rich or water-poor formation scenario. The star TOI-1453 belongs to the Galactic thin disc based on Gaia kinematics and has a sub-solar metallicity. This system is orbited by a fainter stellar companion at a projected distance of ∼150 AU, classifying TOI-1453 b and c of S-type planets. These various planetary and stellar characteristics make TOI-1453 a valuable system for understanding the origin of super-Earths and sub-Neptunes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207