MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408216195 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.06.25323509

City-wide Built Environment SARS-CoV-2 Detection for COVID-19 Surveillance

2025· preprint· en· W4408216195 on OpenAlexaffabout
Derek R. MacFadden, Michael Fralick, Caroline Nott, Jason Moggridge, Alexandra M.A. Hicks, Tamara Van Bakel, Evgueni Doukhanine, Aaron Hinz, Nisha Thampi, Sarah Mansour, Engluy Khov, Tasha Burhunduli, Douglas G. Manuel, Alex Wong, Rees Kassen

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsBruyèreChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityCarleton UniversityOttawa HospitalMontfort HospitalOutotec (Canada)Queensway-Carleton HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoSinai Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSars virusVirologyBetacoronavirusPandemicGeographyMedicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Built environment surveillance has shown promise for monitoring COVID-19 burden at granular geographic scales, but its utility for surveillance across larger areas and populations is unknown. Our study aims to evaluate the role of built environment detection of SARS-CoV-2 for the surveillance of COVID-19 across broad geographies and populations. We conducted a prospective city-wide sampling study to examine the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 on floors and COVID-19 burden. We used non-parametric correlation analyses and linear models to evaluate associations between SARS-CoV-2 signals and COVID-19 outcomes, across multiple locations/populations over time. Sampling sites included schools, libraries, and emergency departments in the capital city of Ottawa, Canada, from October 2022 to March 2023. Floor sampling was performed across spaces, and outcomes were evaluated at aggregate levels. Detection (presence/absence) and quantification (viral load) of SARS-CoV-2 was determined by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction conducted on floor swabs collected weekly at study locations. The main outcomes, and measures of COVID-19 burden, were (1) weekly regional wastewater signal and (2) weekly admitted COVID-19 patient census from hospitals. We collected 1,863 built environment floor samples over the 6-month study period, with an overall swab positivity for SARS-CoV-2 of 45% (95%CI 43%-48%). We found a strong correlation between overall built environmental swab viral load and hospital COVID-19 census (Spearman’s r =0.64, p =0.0017), but no correlation between regional wastewater and hospital COVID-19 census (Spearman’s r =-0.15, p=0.5). We found a strong correlation (Spearman’s r =0.76, p =9x10 -5 ) between hospital-specific swab viral copy number and hospital-specific COVID-19 census, which is a likely driver of the overall association between swab load and census. Built environment surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 from hospitals was strongly correlated with hospital burden with improved delineation of hospital COVID-19 cases compared to regional wastewater. These findings support the use of built environment surveillance for quantification of infectious burden amongst institutionalized groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207