Иконографическая программа Кылычлар килисе и ее место в византийской традиции постиконоборческого периода
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents a review of the iconographic program of Kılıçlar Kilise in Cappadocia set within the context of Byzantine monumental painting from the 9th to the 11th century. The analysis of the peculiarities of this program allows us to get a deeper understanding of the processes in Byzantine church decoration in the 9th–10th centuries. During that period some important iconographic developments took place that influenced the iconographic programs of the Late Macedonian and Comnenian periods but left no surviving traces in Constantinople. Kılıçlar Kilise reflects some crucial aspects of these processes. The decoration of its upper zone reflects two well-known types of the dome decoration of multi-domed churches in the metropolitan tradition. The prothesis reveals one of the earliest examples of the “Communion of the Apostles” in Byzantine monumental painting. The Christological cycle of Kılıçlar Kilise comprises two semantic zones: the “upper” zone contains the most significant Gospel scenes, while the “lower” zone provides additional compositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".