MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408216517 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.04.25323079

Genetic liability to psoriasis predicts severe disease outcomes

2025· preprint· en· W4408216517 on OpenAlexaff
Jake Saklatvala, Samuel Lessard, Maris Teder‐Laving, Laurent F. Thomas, Ravi Ramessur, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Anne Barton, David Baudry, John Bowes, Ben Brumpton, Vinod Chandran, Clément Chatelain, Emanuele de Rinaldis, James T. Elder, David Ellinghaus, John Foerster, André Franke, Dafna D. Gladman, Wayne Gulliver, Ulrike Hüffmeier, Laura Huilaja, Kristian Hveem, Khader Shameer, Külli Kingo, Katherine Klinger, Sulev Kõks, Wilson Liao, Rajan P. Nair, Joanne Nititham, Proton Rahman, André Reis, Philip E. Stuart, Kaisa Tasanen, Tanel Traks, Lam C. Tsoi, Steffen Uebe, Katie Watts, Satveer K. Mahil, Sinéad Langan, Sara Brown, Mari Løset, Lavinia Paternoster, Nick Dand, Catherine Smith, Michael A. Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalNexus Clinical Research (Canada)Memorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome Trust
KeywordsPsoriasisLiabilityDiseaseMedicineBusinessActuarial scienceInternal medicineDermatologyAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease with heterogeneous presentation. Up to 30% of individuals have severe disease with a greater surface area of skin involvement, co-morbidity burden and impact on quality of life. Prognostic biomarkers of psoriasis severity could improve allocation of clinical resources and enable earlier intervention to prevent disease progression, and a genetic biomarker would be cost-effective, stable over time, and unaffected by treatment or comorbidity. Methods Psoriasis severity was studied in four European population-based biobanks and classified based on level of clinical intervention received, with criteria for severe disease including hospitalisation due to psoriasis, use of systemic immunomodulating therapy or phototherapy. Common genetic variants, polygenic risk scores and traditional epidemiological risk factors were tested for association with severe psoriasis in each of the constituent biobanks and combined through meta-analysis. The distribution of psoriasis polygenic risk was also evaluated in a cohort of 4 151 participants in the UK-based severe psoriasis registry, BSTOP. Results In the population-based datasets, 9 738 of 44 904 individuals with psoriasis (21.7%) were classified as having severe disease. Genetic variants within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and the TNIP1 and IL12B psoriasis susceptibility loci were associated with severe disease at genome-wide significance (P<5.0×10 −8 ). Furthermore, a strong positive correlation was observed between psoriasis susceptibility and severity effect sizes across all psoriasis susceptibility loci. An individual’s genetic liability to psoriasis as measured with a polygenic risk score (PRS) strongly associated with disease severity, with a magnitude of effect comparable to established severity risk factors such as obesity and smoking. The top 5% of psoriasis cases by genetic liability to psoriasis were 1.23-to-2.00 times as likely than the average psoriasis case to have severe disease. Psoriasis cases in the BSTOP severe disease registry were 3.10-fold enriched for a PRS that exceeded the 95th percentile established among UK Biobank psoriasis cases. Conclusions The psoriasis susceptibility PRS demonstrates utility, and may be more effective than established epidemiological factors, as a stratification tool to identify those individuals that are at greatest risk of severe disease and may benefit most from early intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.236
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→