Separating Absorption and Scattering Coefficients for the Characterization of Optical Turbid Media Using Structured Laser Illumination Planar Imaging and Conventional Spectroscopy Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on the potential of combining the Structured Laser Illumination Planar Imaging (SLIPI) technique and optical spectroscopy for characterizing scattering and absorbing liquids. Water solutions of milk and coffee were investigated at 10 different turbidity levels. The SLIPI technique eliminates the light intensity contributions from multiply scattered photons in these solutions, enabling accurate and reliable measurements of their extinction coefficients . Optical spectroscopy, on the other hand, provides complementary insights into the interaction between light and matter, allowing precise spectral analysis. The linearity of the extinction coefficient measurements obtained using the SLIPI technique as a function of concentration, combined with spectroscopic approximations, enables the separation of absorption and scattering coefficients. This opens the possibility for precise characterization of both absorption and scattering properties in dense liquid media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".