MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sounding the alarm: Notes from the Editor-in-Chief Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier

2025· article· en· W4408217014 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexandrine Boudreault‐Fournier, Sue Frohlick, Karoline Truchon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepth soundingHistoryALARMGeologyOceanographyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I n the fall of 2023, we launched a special call for papers titled "Sounding the alarm" for Anthropologica's newest section, "Seedings," a section dedicated to planting and growing ideas related to current events and debates.Even though we launched our call to "sound the alarm" over a year ago, it is frightening to realize how relevant it is today, perhaps even more so than it was then.Let's look back.Summer 2023 was officially the hottest on record everywhere in the world.In Canada, the 2023 wildfire season was the most destructive remembered, "like no other year, by a stupendous margin" 1 with more than 6,500 wildfires reported by the beginning of September.But Canada was not the only country with these terrifying figures.Unparalleled wildfires in the northern hemisphere destroyed millions of acres of boreal forests, including in Russia, Greece, Portugal and Maui, Hawaii.As we write these lines, thousands of firefighters are still battling the flames in densely populated Los Angeles County.Wildfires are now anticipated calamitous events that the government, people, and survivors must, sooner or later, prepare to fight.Yet, wildfires are striking evidence-a clear alarm bell-that we are losing ground in this quickly and dramatically changing world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0120.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologicaSame topicSound Studies and AuralityFrench-language works237,207