MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408218217 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.03.25323291

The cost of inaction to strengthen the resilience of primary health care in Latin America and the Caribbean: a modelling study

2025· preprint· en· W4408218217 on OpenAlexaff
Nick Scott, Pablo Villalobos Dintrans, Marina Gonzalez-Samano, Manuela Villar Uribe

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansResilience (materials science)Primary careCaribbean regionPrimary health carePolitical scienceEconomic growthDevelopment economicsHealth careMedicineEconomicsFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region will face future public health emergencies due to pandemics, natural disasters, migration, economic crisis or other unforeseen events. These events disrupt healthcare service coverage with consequences for morbidity, mortality and economic productivity. This study aimed to estimate the health and economic cost of potential future health system shocks, as a proxy for the cost of inaction to strengthen the resilience of primary health care. Methods For 33 countries in LAC, primary health care shock scenarios were modelled as short-term reductions to the coverage of antenatal care and child health interventions using the Lives Saved Tool, and to family planning services and non-communicable disease management using custom models. Primary health care shocks starting in 2026 and leading to 25-50% coverage reductions (50% being a COVID-19-like disruption) with recovery periods of one to five years were compared to a strengthened primary health care scenario with intervention coverage maintained. Excess deaths and unintended pregnancies were estimated for 2026-2030 and converted to lifetime societal economic costs with 3% per annum discounting based on years of life lost (deaths) and reduced workforce productivity (unintended pregnancies). Findings Depending on the magnitude and recovery time, the modelled primary health care shocks resulted in an additional 600-3,100 stillbirths, 300-1,400 neonatal deaths, 2,000-10,000 child deaths, 2,200-11,300 maternal deaths, 26,000-131,000 non-communicable disease deaths, and 2.7-14.1 million unintended pregnancies over 2026-2030. This translated to US$7-35 billion in societal economic costs per primary health care shock. Interpretation Substantive investment in primary health care resilience would be warranted to limit the potential impact of health system shocks on service coverage. Funding The World Bank.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207