MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408218241 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097564

Mental and physical health disorders following paediatric traumatic injury: a population-based longitudinal study in Manitoba, Canada

2025· article· en· W4408218241 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rae Spiwak, Justin Gawaziuk, Dominic W. Chung, Brenda Comaskey, Nora Cristall, Dan Chateau, Jitender Sareen, Sarvesh Logsetty

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineMental healthEpidemiologyPublic healthOccupational safety and healthPsychiatryInjury preventionPopulationPoison controlSuicide preventionGerontologyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE: Paediatric traumatic injury (PTI) is a leading cause of hospitalisation among children. Little is known about subsequent mental and physical health disorders while accounting for pre-injury health. OBJECTIVE: To compare pre-injury and post-injury mental and physical disorders in survivors of PTI with an uninjured matched cohort from the general population. This study hypothesised injured youth will have increased rates of mental and physical disorders relative to matched uninjured youth in the post-injury period. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study using linked administrative health data to examine paediatric patients hospitalised for injury between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2016, measured 2 years pre-injury and 2 years post-injury. SETTING: Population-based study in Manitoba, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Youth<18 years old who survived to discharge after an injury requiring hospitalisation in the study period (n=9551) were matched 1:5 (age, sex and region) to youth from the general uninjured population (n=47 755). EXPOSURES: PTI that required hospitalisation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mental disorders (anxiety, depression and substance use) and physical disorders (arthritis, cancer, diabetes, gastrointestinal, hypertension and total respiratory morbidity) were measured at physician visits and hospitalisations 2 years pre-injury and post-injury. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (ARR). RESULTS: This study examined 9551 in the injured cohort and 47 755 matches in the uninjured cohort. Injured individuals had increased ARRs for all mental disorders (p<0.0006) pre-injury (anxiety=1.30 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.47); depression=2.00 (95% CI, 1.73 to 2.32); substance use=4.99 (95% CI, 3.08 to 5.20); any mental disorder=1.50 (95% CI, 1.37 to 1.66)) and post-injury (anxiety=1.66 (95% CI, 1.51 to 1.82); depression=2.87 (95% CI, 2.57 to 3.21); substance use=3.25 (95% CI, 2.64 to 3.99); any mental disorder=1.90 (95% CI, 1.76 to 2.04)). For physical disorders, injured individuals had increased ARRs (p<0.0006) pre-injury for arthritis (1.50 (95% CI, 1.39 to 1.60)), cancer (1.97 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.88)), gastrointestinal (1.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18)) and any physical disorder (1.14 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.18)). Post-injury, the injured had higher ARRs (p<0.0006) for arthritis (2.02 (95% CI, 1.91 to 2.15)), cancer (1.97 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.88)), diabetes (1.76 (95% CI, 1.33 to 2.32)), gastrointestinal (1.19 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.27)), hypertension (2.36 (95% CI, 1.83 to 3.06)) and any physical disorder (1.33 (95% CI, 1.29 to 1.37)). Comparing the pre-injury and post-injury periods, ARRs for injured showed a difference over time for all mental disorders except substance use and all physical disorders except gastrointestinal and total respiratory morbidity compared with matched uninjured. Greater injury severity was associated with two times greater ARR for developing any mental health disorder, and the injured had three times the ARR for dying by suicide (p<0.0006). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Child survivors of traumatic injury had increased relative rates of mental and physical disorders compared with a matched uninjured cohort. These findings support targeted intervention strategies for this population at the time of hospitalisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→