MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

F10.7 vs. QEUV: What is the Most Germane Solar EUV Proxy for Thermospheric and Space Weather Investigations?

2025· preprint· en· W4408220901 on OpenAlexaff
Fazlul I. Laskar, W. K. Peterson, Phillip C. Chamberlin, R. Eastes, Thomas Berger, K. Greer, J. Correira, J. S. Evans, A. W. Yau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGermaneSpace weatherProxy (statistics)Extreme ultraviolet lithographyMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesGeologyPhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

F10.7 is the current, standard index of variability in solar Extreme UltraViolet (EUV) irradiance. An alternative index of solar variability is QEUV, which has been retrieved using observations of Earth’€™s Far UltraViolet (FUV) airglow as well as EUV spectra modeled from solar EUV observations. Daily QEUV derived from FUV airglow is available from the recent TIMED-GUVI and GOLD missions, as is QEUV from solar EUV observations. Differences between temporal variations in F10.7 and those in QEUV are identified. Comparisons show that QEUV more accurately captures variability on day-to-day and solar rotation time scales, and during solar minimum periods than F10.7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207