MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

F10.7 vs. QEUV: What is the Most Germane Solar EUV Proxy for Thermospheric and Space Weather Investigations?

2025· preprint· en· W4408220901 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGermaneSpace weatherProxy (statistics)Extreme ultraviolet lithographyMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesGeologyPhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

F10.7 is the current, standard index of variability in solar Extreme UltraViolet (EUV) irradiance. An alternative index of solar variability is QEUV, which has been retrieved using observations of Earth’€™s Far UltraViolet (FUV) airglow as well as EUV spectra modeled from solar EUV observations. Daily QEUV derived from FUV airglow is available from the recent TIMED-GUVI and GOLD missions, as is QEUV from solar EUV observations. Differences between temporal variations in F10.7 and those in QEUV are identified. Comparisons show that QEUV more accurately captures variability on day-to-day and solar rotation time scales, and during solar minimum periods than F10.7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207