MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408220907 · doi:10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.103074

ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis in a Patient With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

2025· article· en· W4408220907 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey Lam, Bryce Alexander, Joseph Abunassar, Aws Almufleh

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsCardiac amyloidosisMedicineAmyloidosisSarcoidosisCardiologyCardiac sarcoidosisPulmonary sarcoidosisInternal medicineIntensive care medicineDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Amyloid transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis is a progressive cardiomyopathy characterized by misfolded transthyretin deposition, resulting in ventricular stiffening which may cause cardiac dysfunction. CASE SUMMARY: An 86-year-old man with history of pulmonary sarcoidosis presented with progressive dyspnea and emesis. An electrocardiogram demonstrated complete heart block and he underwent permanent pacemaker implantation. While initially suspicious for cardiac sarcoidosis, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and pyrophosphate scan were consistent with ATTR amyloidosis, which was treated with tafamidis. DISCUSSION: Sarcoidosis has rarely been found to mimic cardiac amyloidosis in cases of equivocal testing. Pyrophosphate myocardial imaging has been shown to have high sensitivity in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and may aid in distinguishing pathologies. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: While cardiac sarcoidosis should be suspected in patients with known extra-cardiac sarcoidosis who develop cardiac dysfunction or conduction disease, other infiltrative conditions, including amyloidosis, must also be considered. Multimodality imaging has an important role in diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Case ReportsSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207