AUDIT SISTEM INFORMASI DALAM MENGUKUR KEPATUHAN ISO 27002
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi tingkat kepatuhan PT Jaya Sawit Langkat (PT JSL) terhadap standar ISO 27002 dalam konteks keamanan informasi. pada era digital saat ini, perusahaan menghadapi ancaman serius terhadap kerahasiaan, integritas, serta ketersediaan data. Meskipun pentingnya keamanan informasi diakui, banyak perusahaan, termasuk PT JSL, sering kali mengabaikan implementasinya.Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan meliputi studi literatur, observasi, dan wawancara menggunakan pegawai untuk memahami praktik keamanan yang ada dan tantangan yang dihadapi. hasil audit menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kematangan implementasi kontrol keamanan informasi di PT JSL berada pada kategori menengah dengan nilai rata-rata 2.49. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa meskipun perusahaan telah memulai penerapan kontrol sesuai ISO 27002, masih ada banyak area yang memerlukan perbaikan. Rekomendasi utama mencakup peningkatan pelatihan bagi karyawan tentang keamanan informasi dan pelaksanaan audit berkala untuk mengidentifikasi dan memperbaiki kelemahan pada sistem keamanan yang ada. dengan langkah-langkah tersebut, diharapkan PT JSL dapat menaikkan keamanan data dan kepercayaan pelanggan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it