MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408221750 · doi:10.46576/wdw.v19i1.5586

Analisis Audit Sistem Informasi Absensi Di PT. Clay Jaya Bersama Dengan Framework COBIT-5 Dengan Domain MEA

2025· article· id· W4408221750 on OpenAlexaff
Hanafi Hanafi, Dimas Prayogi, Muhammad Rizki Pratama, Muhammad Ardiansyah

Bibliographic record

VenueWarta Dharmawangsa · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOBITAuditBusinessDomain (mathematical analysis)Business administrationMathematicsAccountingCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pada era globalisasi, teknologi informasi (TI) memainkan peran penting dalam efisiensi operasional perusahaan, salah satunya melalui sistem absensi berbasis fingerprint. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas sistem tersebut di PT. CLAY JAYA BERSAMA menggunakan kerangka kerja COBIT-5 pada domain MEA (Monitoring, Evaluate, and Assess). Metode yang digunakan meliputi observasi, studi literatur, wawancara, kuesioner, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tingkat kapabilitas sistem berada pada level Established Process dengan rata-rata nilai 2,94 dari skala 1–4. Hal ini mencerminkan bahwa sistem telah terdokumentasi dengan baik, memiliki pengelolaan yang terstruktur, dan mampu memenuhi kebutuhan operasional perusahaan. Kesimpulan ini mengindikasikan bahwa implementasi teknologi informasi di PT. CLAY JAYA BERSAMA berjalan efektif dan mendukung tujuan bisnis yang diharapkan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarta DharmawangsaSame topicDecision Support System ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207