MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Track After Detection of Inert Space Objects in Conjunction with Satellite-Based Plasma Wave Sensors

2025· article· en· W4408222675 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. A. Bernhardt, Bengt Eliasson, W. A. Scales, Andrew Howarth, Victoria Foss, Russell L. Scott

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjunction (astronomy)Track (disk drive)SatelliteComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Remote sensingGeodesyAerospace engineeringGeologyPhysicsEngineeringAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Techniques have been developed to track small objects in space using plasma waves produced by orbital debris as they pass through the ionosphere. Computer simulations and laboratory measurements provide predictions and validation of this technique to detect objects that are not seen by optical and radar systems. In situ observations that confirm the presence of these plasma waves have been made during space sensor conjunctions with known space objects. Small space objects, when they pass through a structured environment, can also be detected with ground sensors and remote satellite instruments. Space debris and satellites moving through plasma irregularities excite electric and magnetic emissions such as whistler, compressional Alfvén, or lower hybrid waves. A whistler wave disturbance is generated by conversion of orbital kinetic energy into an electromagnetic plasma oscillation when a charged space object encounters a region of field aligned irregularities (FAIs). Whistlers propagate undamped at around 9000 km/s from the source regions and can be detected at large ranges over 100 km. Fast magnetosonic waves have been detected out to these ranges of 100 km in situ electric field probes on the Canadian CASSIOPE/Swarm-E spacecraft. After detection, space debris geolocation is required to update orbit prediction models. In situ measurements from host sensors can provide both range and angle-of-arrival from measurements of electromagnetic (EM) plasma waves in space. The angle of arrive needs a vector sensor of the EM fields to give both the electric (E) and magnetic (H) vector components of the incident signal from the space debris. Forming the E × B Poynting flux from the target object, yielding its source direction. A time history of this direction allows estimation of the target trajectory has it passes by the host sensor platform. When charged target debris crosses a field aligned irregularity, it launches a dispersive waveform as a whistler down-chirp or a magnetosonic up-chirp. Propagation from the source point causes temporal dispersion in these signals that stretch in both time and spatial extent. Matched filter processing of the measured signals with wavelet-like, plasma waveforms allows determination of the range to the source at specific generation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→