MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408225277 · doi:10.58931/cdt.2025.61134

Recommendations and Basic Principles of Phototherapy

2025· article· en· W4408225277 on OpenAlexaff
Tashmeeta Ahad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian dermatology today. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpistemologyPsychologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phototherapy has long been a cornerstone in dermatology, offered in most dermatology clinics globally. Despite the advent of several new biologic and systemic therapeutics, phototherapy remains a favoured treatment option due to its low side-effect profile and efficacy for treating mild-to-moderate inflammatory dermatoses. It can be used for a variety of skin conditions, including psoriasis, eczema, vitiligo, lichen planus, mycosis fungoides, pityriasis lichenoides, nodular prurigo, pruritus, and morphea. In this article, we will provide an overview of the basic principles of phototherapy, as well as offering recommendations for managing a phototherapy service. Our focus will be on whole-body phototherapy, without the use of psoralens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian dermatology today.Same topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207