MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408227884 · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-24-0073.1

Heat Transport toward Sea Ice by Transient Processes and Coherent Mesoscale Eddies in an Idealized Southern Ocean

2025· article· en· W4408227884 on OpenAlexafffund
Jan Klaus Rieck, Carolina O. Dufour, Louis-Philippe Nadeau, Andrew F. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiMcGill University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyEddyGeologyClimatologyOceanographySea iceTransient (computer programming)Ocean heat contentOcean currentMeteorologyTurbulenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The oceanic mesoscale variability contributes significantly to meridional heat transport (HT), especially in regions with high eddy kinetic energy such as the Southern Ocean (SO). However, there are gaps in our understanding of mesoscale contributions toward and within sea ice–covered regions due to the lack of observations and resolution in ocean and climate models. Using output from an idealized configuration of a coupled ocean–sea ice model simulating the SO at 10-km horizontal resolution, the contribution of the full spectrum of resolved transient mesoscale variability to the total meridional HT toward and under sea ice is investigated. The total HT is poleward, dominated by the transient HT which is primarily along isopycnals and closely follows the residual overturning circulation. The HT induced by coherent mesoscale eddies is extracted using an eddy detection and tracking algorithm. Coherent eddies contribute up to 20%–30% to the meridional transient HT, depending on latitude, with equal contributions from cyclones and anticyclones. The meridional HT by coherent eddies is predominantly accomplished by stirring with only 30% contributed by heat trapped inside these eddies. The majority of the transient HT across the ice edge occurs below the mixed layer, and this heat is then upwelled toward the surface with coherent eddies contributing between 20% and 30%. Within the mixed layer, 15%–25% of the upwelled heat is transferred to the pack ice. Albeit significant, coherent mesoscale eddies play a secondary role in the SO’s poleward HT that is primarily achieved by other transient mesoscale processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207