MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408229790 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.03.25322984

50 Hz cortical stimulation increases interictal epileptiform discharges at the seizure onset zone

2025· preprint· en· W4408229790 on OpenAlexaff
Ahdyie Ahmadi, Hellen Kreinter, Benjamin Corrigan, Mohamad Abbass, Greydon Gilmore, Nasim Mortazavi, Giovanni Pellegrino, Jorge G. Burneo, David A. Steven, Jonathan C. Lau, Keith W. MacDougall, Michelle-Lee Jones, Julio Martínez-Trujillo, Ana Suller Martí

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStereoelectroencephalographyIctalNeuroscienceStimulationEpilepsyMedicineAnesthesiaPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract More than 15 million patients worldwide suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Surgical removal of the seizure onset zone (SOZ)—the brain region(s) from where seizures arise—is the best available treatment for these patients, with post-surgical outcomes depending on the successful identification and resection of the SOZ. Most commonly, SOZ mapping localizes ictal activity occurring spontaneously or evoked by cortical stimulation (CS) during presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy using stereoelectroncephalography (SEEG). Mapping events such as interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), paroxysmal hypersynchronic electrical discharges that often occur outside ictal discharges or during CS, have been less used for SOZ localization. We test the hypothesis that IEDs triggered by CS via SEEG investigation can contribute to the mapping of the SOZ. We evaluated the impact of CS on IEDs in patients investigated with SEEG on epilepsy surgery investigation. We recorded intracranial signals from 30 DRE patients (seizure-free post-surgery). Bipolar and high frequency (50 Hz) CS was performed with a pulse width of 300 µs and current spanning 1–8 mA. IEDs were automatically detected pre- and post- stimulation, and their normalized absolute changes were quantified within and outside the SOZ (identified by ictal discharges). We found that IED rates significantly increased post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation within the SOZ, while no significant change was observed outside the SOZ (Linear mixed effect model, p-value <0.001, and AUC=98% for SOZ and 71% for non-SOZ). This effect was present regardless of whether the stimulation was applied to the SOZ or non-SOZ regions, indicating a broader effect of stimulation on the SOZ. Our results offer a quantitative tool for identifying epileptogenic areas in patients with DRE, enhancing the mapping and localization of the SOZ and potentially improving surgical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→