HP1-enhanced chromatin compaction stabilizes a synthetic metabolic circuit in yeast
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chromatin compaction defines genome topology, evolution, and function. The Saccharomycotina subphylum, including the fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have a decompacted genome, possibly because they lost two genes mediating a specific histone lysine methylation and histone binding protein heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). This decompaction may result in the higher-than-expected mutation and meiotic recombination rates observed in this species. To test this hypothesis, we retro-engineered S. cerevisiae to compact the genome by expressing the HP1 homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Sp Swi6 and H3K9 methyltransferase Sp Clr4. The resulting strain had significantly more compact chromatin and reduced rates of mutation and meiotic recombination. The increased genomic stability significantly prolongs the optogenetic control of an engineered strain designed to grow only in blue light. This result demonstrates the potential of our approach to enhance the stability of strains for metabolic engineering and other synthetic biology applications, which are prone to lose activities due to genetic instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".