MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408232378 · doi:10.1183/23120541.01331-2024

Respiratory burden in post-acute COVID-19 sequelae: a longitudinal study of airway and systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes

2025· article· en· W4408232378 on OpenAlexafffund
Mei Nee Chiu, Abhiroop Chowdhury, Kayla Zhang, Snehal Somalwar, Rameen Jamil, A. Thakar, Karen Sidhom, N. Sedhom, N. Thanavala, Manan Mukherjee, Melanie Kjarsgaard, Carmen Garrido Venegas, Nisarg Radadia, Nadia Suray Tan, Zil Patel, Nabila Ahammed, Takuma Isshiki, Santi Nolasco, Zain Chagla, Martin Kolb, MyLinh Duong, Andrea S. Gershon, Parameswaran Nair, Imran Satia, Konstantinos Tselios, Terence Ho, N. Balakrishnan, Sarah Svenningsen, Manali Mukherjee

Bibliographic record

VenueERJ Open Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)AirwayRespiratory systemSystemic inflammationIntensive care medicinePandemicInflammationInternal medicineVirologySurgeryDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It is unclear why patients with post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 sequelae (PACS) often present with persistent respiratory symptoms. We hypothesised that autoimmune inflammatory biomarkers may be associated with the persistence and/or resolution of these symptoms. We performed symptom-based unsupervised cluster analysis to evaluate airway and systemic immune responses in PACS participants over time. Methods: Individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, a persistent range of PACS symptoms for >12 weeks and no previous diagnosis of chronic lung disease were recruited and assessed at a 6-month follow-up. Assessments included St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), pulmonary function testing, 6-min walk test and analysis of blood and sputum inflammatory markers. Results: Unsupervised clustering based on SGRQ domains of 85 PACS individuals revealed four clusters. Cluster 1 (14%) reported no impairment and normal lung function, whereas clusters 2 (24%) and 3 (36%) were moderately symptomatic. Cluster 3 had a greater proportion of reduced lung function. Cluster 4 (26%) reported severe impairment across all SGRQ domains, with significantly lower 6-min walk distance, dyspnoea and fatigue. Clusters 3 and 4 had evidence of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein and anti-SS-B/La). Sputum analysis showed no evidence of airway inflammation in any cluster. After 6 months, improved symptoms in 43% of individuals correlated with increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage predicted and low serum interleukin-8 (p<0.05) over time. Multivariate regression suggested that a reduction in serum anti-SS-B/La IgG over 6 months was associated with improvement of SGRQ impact (t=3.17, p=0.003) and activity (t=2.04, p=0.005). Conclusions: A subset of previously healthy PACS patients have clinically relevant respiratory burden as identified by unbiased SGRQ domain analysis associated with systemic inflammation and autoantibodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueERJ Open ResearchSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207