MAEST: accurately spatial domain detection in spatial transcriptomics with graph masked autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) technology provides gene expression profiles with spatial context, offering critical insights into cellular interactions and tissue architecture. A core task in ST is spatial domain identification, which involves detecting coherent regions with similar spatial expression patterns. However, existing methods often fail to fully exploit spatial information, leading to limited representational capacity and suboptimal clustering accuracy. Here, we introduce MAEST, a novel graph neural network model designed to address these limitations in ST data. MAEST leverages graph masked autoencoders to denoise and refine representations while incorporating graph contrastive learning to prevent feature collapse and enhance model robustness. By integrating one-hop and multi-hop representations, MAEST effectively captures both local and global spatial relationships, improving clustering precision. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets, including the human brain, mouse hippocampus, olfactory bulb, brain, and embryo, demonstrate that MAEST outperforms seven state-of-the-art methods in spatial domain identification. Furthermore, MAEST showcases its ability to integrate multi-slice data, identifying joint domains across horizontal tissue sections with high accuracy. These results highlight MAEST's versatility and effectiveness in unraveling the spatial organization of complex tissues. The source code of MAEST can be obtained at https://github.com/clearlove2333/MAEST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".