MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408235537 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2025.3549234

IntSHU: A Security-Enabled Intelligent Soft Handover Approach for UAV-Aided 5G and Beyond

2025· article· en· W4408235537 on OpenAlexaff
Raja Karmakar, Georges Kaddoum, Ouassima Akhrif

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHandoverComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) play a significant role in serving as gNodeBs (gNBs), or user devices (UDs). However, considering the high data rates and low latency required by fifth generation (5G) and beyond, it is essential to maintain a reliable connection at UAVs, particularly due to frequent handovers. To minimize handover failures, the hysteresis margin and time-to-trigger (TTT) should be dynamically adjusted. Furthermore, to prevent vulnerabilities to threats, UAV and gNB authentication and secure communication should be addressed during handovers. However, available literature uses a learning-based approach to handover management in UAV-aided 5G networks, thereby neglecting security, or offers a handover authentication mechanism, but lacks a novel handover strategy. To fill this gap in the literature, in this study, we design an Intelligent Soft Handover for UAV-enabled cellular networks (IntSHU), a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based scheme designed for intelligent soft handovers in UAV-enabled 5G and beyond. IntSHU uses adapted hysteresis margins and TTT values, dynamically generated through an$\epsilon $-greedy policy. In addition, we implement a lightweight, physically unclonable function (PUF)-based message encryption and authentication scheme via blockchain for streamlined access control during handovers. The results of our simulation indicate that IntSHU significantly enhances network performance by facilitating reliable soft handovers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207