MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408235655 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3549057

Advancing Fusarium Head Blight Detection in Wheat Crop: A Review and Future Directions to Sustainable Agriculture

2025· review· en· W4408235655 on OpenAlexafffund
Nisar Ali, Muhib Ullah, Ahmed Mohammed, Abdul Bais, Yuefeng Ruan, Richard D. Cuthbert, Jatinder S. Sangha

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Crop AllianceSaskatchewan Wheat Development CommissionMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsCropAgricultureBlightSustainable agricultureFusariumAgronomyEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringEngineeringAgroforestryGeographyBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a significant disease affecting wheat, one of the most vital global crops, with severe implications for crop yield and food safety. Traditional FHB detection methods have limitations, highlighting the need for innovative and sustainable solutions. This review investigates the Fusarium species responsible for FHB, the disease’s life cycle, symptoms, and FHB mycotoxins affecting human and animal health. We focus on deep learning (DL) techniques for FHB detection that improve accuracy, resource efficiency, environmental sustainability, and error reduction compared to conventional methods. DL models, integrated with RGB and spectral imaging and enhanced by transfer learning and data augmentation, achieve high precision in detecting FHB across wheat varieties. Advancements in UAV-based RGB and spectral imaging paired with DL show promising results for early detection, reducing crop damage and lowering carbon emissions. However, data imbalance, background noise, and model overestimation persist. Optimization strategies and multi-modal approaches integrating imaging with environmental data have been proposed to enhance model robustness. This review underscores DL’s potential to improve FHB detection, crop yield, and sustainable agricultural practices. Future directions emphasize IoT integration, real-time low-power electronics, and blockchain for data security, addressing ethical concerns in labour and data privacy in agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207