Innovative strategy: Utilizing social capital to develop green products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research mainly focuses on developing health tourism in rural areas, especially in Bangli, Bali, which has excellent potential but faces various challenges. Through an approach that involves local community involvement, this research aims to create a tourism experience that supports physical and mental health while empowering local communities. The quantitative research method was used to collect data from 450 respondents in Subaya Village. The sample was taken with the criteria of understanding the concept of wellness tourism, having an empowerment group, and having acquired knowledge about designing wellness tourism-supporting products. After data collection, out of 450 questionnaires distributed, as many as 250 were returned, with 150 answers that met the respondents' criteria. The results of the analysis show that the integration of local cultural practices and natural resources can increase the attractiveness of destinations, as well as provide significant economic and social benefits for the community. The study also highlights the importance of eco-friendly products in enhancing the traveler experience, which can increase visitor satisfaction and loyalty. Through a sustainable health tourism model, it is hoped that synergy can be created between local economic development and environmental conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".