Artificial Intelligence and Business Transition: Paving the Way for Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is steadily becoming the new normal in doing business through increasing operational performance, improving customer relations, and increasing predictive accuracy. This quantitative exploratory research employed a mixed-methods approach, integrating qualitative insights into organizational trends, best practices, and challenges with quantitative assessments of performance measures, cost savings, and business outcomes. Several surveys were administered to a diverse group of business professionals. The study, situated within the field of applied research, explores how AI facilitates business growth through change and proposes best practices for successful integration. It also studies what happens during transition periods when organizations emphasize artificial intelligence, NLP, and robotic process automation as top technologies since they contribute to completing work tasks, analyzing large data sets, and improving individual communication with clients. Besides potentially generated cost savings and a long-term increase in business value, there are several obstacles that organizations face if implementing AI, such as high initial costs and a market that requires professional knowledge on the topic. If implemented correctly, AI technologies hold huge potential for businesses going through transitions and taking advantage of AI’s strengths. For this reason, it is important to describe and analyze trends like AI technology integration accurately. This article suggests best practices for applying AI in business development during transformations. Keywords: Artificial intelligence, machine learning, business transitions, predictive analytics, robotic process automation, cost reduction, AI adoption strategies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".