MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408240510 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2025.16.0008

Case Study on Molecular Breeding for Drought-Resistant Sweet Potato Varieties

2025· article· en· W4408240510 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xu Ying, Yanjun Lu, Lin Zhao, Jiang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPlant breedingDrought resistanceCultivarAgronomyDrought toleranceMolecular breedingBiotechnologyHorticultureGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study clarifies the importance of drought resistance in sweet potato cultivation and systematically evaluates the application of molecular techniques, such as marker-assisted selection (MAS), genomic selection (GS), and quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, in enhancing drought tolerance in sweet potatoes. Several candidate genes associated with water retention, abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathways, and key transcription factors were identified, which play a crucial role in improving drought resistance. Field trials validated that newly developed drought-resistant sweet potato varieties exhibited significantly enhanced water-use efficiency, optimized root architecture, and stable yield performance, outperforming traditional breeding methods. By focusing on molecular breeding for drought-resistant sweet potatoes, this study provides both technical support for breeding resilient varieties and essential insights for improving agricultural adaptability to climate change, thus contributing to food security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207