Unveiling Drought Tolerance Mechanisms in Soybean Seed Germination: New Insights from Physiological and Molecular Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drought tolerance in soybeans is crucial for ensuring sustainable crop production under increasing climate variability. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying drought tolerance during soybean seed germination, as well as integrative approaches and practical applications in breeding strategies. Physiological mechanisms include osmotic adjustment through proline and soluble sugar accumulation, water uptake and retention mediated by seed coat properties and aquaporins, and antioxidant defense systems involving both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. On a molecular level, the study explores gene expression regulation by drought-responsive transcription factors, stress-inducible promoters and genes, signal transduction pathways including ABA-dependent and independent pathways, and genomic and proteomic approaches to identify drought-responsive genes and proteins. Integrative approaches such as systems biology and gene editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9 are discussed for their potential in enhancing drought tolerance. Practical applications focus on breeding strategies, highlighting marker-assisted selection and comparing conventional breeding with biotechnological methods. The study also addresses challenges and opportunities in developing drought-resilient soybean varieties, considering environmental variability, field conditions, and socioeconomic factors. The findings underscore the importance of a multi-faceted approach to improve drought tolerance in soybeans, with implications for global food security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".