MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408240706 · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.02.008

Gestational Diabetes Laboratory Testing in Alberta Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2025· article· en· W4408240706 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jamie L. Benham, Nikki Stephenson, Amy Metcalfe, Lois Donovan, Denice S. Feig, Christy Pylylpjuk, Chelsea Ruth, Howard Berger, Sarah M Sigurdson, Baiju R. Shah, Jennifer M. Yamamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Diabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaAlberta Children's HospitalManitoba HealthLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMedtronic
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicGestational diabetes2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Diabetes mellitusVirologyObstetricsPregnancyGestationInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiseaseOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are high-quality data demonstrating improved pregnancy outcomes with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment [1]. Thus, screening for and treatment of GDM is recommended by clinical practice guidelines around the world [2]. Although controversy remains regarding the optimal screening recommendations, both who should be screened and which glucose test and level cutoffs should be used, most international guideline recommendations include dynamic glucose testing, such as the 75- or 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with or without a preceding 50-g glucose challenge [3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Diabetes→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→