Concurrent Control of Sodium and Bicarbonate Serum Concentrations Using a Four‐Stream Hemodialysis Fluid Delivery System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previously, two reports proposed a four-stream dialysis fluid delivery system consisting of an acid concentrate, a base concentrate, a sodium chloride concentrate, and product water for correcting dysnatremias and metabolic acid-base disorders separately, by hemodialysis. METHODS: This report describes a new method for the clinical use of the previously reported four-stream dialysis fluid delivery system to treat concurrently dysnatremias and metabolic acid-base disturbances by hemodialysis. Pumps attached to each concentrate are designed to control its flow rate. Formulas were derived to determine the flow rate of each of the pumps controlling the flows of the product water ( W ), the base concentrate ( B ), and the sodium chloride concentrate ( S ) for any prescribed combination of sodium and bicarbonate concentrations is the final dialysis fluid. In this scheme, the flow rate of the acid concentrate ( A ), the concentrations of its contents in the final dialysis fluid remain constant. The flow rate ratio W:S:B:A remains also constant at 45 (i.e., 45X). RESULTS: The formulas were entered in an EXCEL flow sheet which determines the flow rate ratio W:S:B:A for any desired combination of sodium and bicarbonate concentrations in the dialysis fluid. The upper and lower limits of the concentrations of sodium and bicarbonate in the dialysis fluid were computed. The system has not been applied clinically. Measurements of any electrolyte concentrations have not been made. DISCUSSION: This system makes the treatment of profound dysnatremias, metabolic acid-base disorders, and combined dysnatremias and metabolic acid-base disorders feasible. The clinical application of the system demands prior in vitro or ex vivo studies plus fastidious and expert attention to ensure safe and dependable application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".