Evolution of Mass Spectrometers for High <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> Biological Ion Formation, Transmission, Analysis and Detection: A Personal Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) has become an essential tool in virtually all academic, pharmaceutical, and biopharmaceutical analytical laboratories. The specialized and bespoke area of MS research and application of high m / z ion (> m / z 6000 and high mass, >150 kDa) formation, transmission, analysis, and detection is a relatively new area of focus for MS that has seen dramatic acceleration in interest over the last two decades. Herein we delve into this exciting aspect of MS, discussing how MS instrumentation has been refined and evolved for native-MS analysis. We cover the early groundbreaking experiments showing high m / z ion formation, transmission, and preservation of protein structure in the gas phase. Additionally, we discuss specific instrument optimizations and modifications that have advanced high m / z ion generation, transmission, analysis, and detection, contributing to the research area known as gas-phase structural biology. Native-MS sample introduction methods, emerging technologies, and future perspectives are also examined. Finally, we share personal opinions, observations, and experiences that are new to the community or previously unpublished.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".