The role of impulsivity and emotion regulation difficulties in nonsuicidal self‐injury and borderline personality disorder symptoms among young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are serious mental health problems that may have common developmental pathways. Adverse childhood environments coupled with trait impulsivity and emotion dysregulation purportedly increase the risk of NSSI and BPD. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association of these risk factors with NSSI and BPD over a 1-year period among young adults (N = 229; aged 18-35; 75.5% female). Participants completed measures of relevant variables at baseline and every 3 months over 12 months. Hypotheses were that emotion regulation difficulties would mediate the association of childhood maltreatment with NSSI and BPD and that impulsivity would moderate the association of childhood maltreatment with ERD. Findings from multilevel modelling analyses indicated that emotion regulation difficulties mediated the association of childhood maltreatment with both NSSI and BPD. Contrary to hypotheses, impulsivity did not moderate the association of childhood maltreatment with emotion regulation difficulties. These findings highlight the importance of emotion regulation difficulties in NSSI and BPD among young adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".