Effect of cariprazine on attention and quality of life in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A post-hoc analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cariprazine, a potent dopamine D 3 -preferring D 3 /D 2 receptor partial agonist, has demonstrated benefits on negative symptoms among patients with schizophrenia. Secondary endpoint and post-hoc analyses have also suggested a benefit of cariprazine on quality of life (QoL) and attention. Data for this post-hoc analysis were pooled from two 6-week, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials evaluating cariprazine among patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. One study included an aripiprazole active-control arm for assay sensitivity. Two populations were analyzed: pooled intention-to-treat (ITT) population ( N = 1043), and the pooled subgroup with predominant negative symptoms (PNS, n = 215), as defined by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) subscale and item cut-off criteria at baseline. Analyses of interest were: Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4 (SQLS-R4) total score; Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) power of attention (PoA), and continuity of attention (CoA). Among study completers, cariprazine and aripiprazole were associated with significant SQLS-R4 improvements in the ITT and PNS populations. Differences in CDR-PoA scores were significant for cariprazine vs. placebo in the ITT and PNS populations, but not for aripiprazole in the ITT or PNS analyses. Differences in CDR-CoA scores were significant for cariprazine vs. placebo in the ITT and PNS analyses; and was significant for aripiprazole vs. placebo in the PNS analysis, but not in the ITT analysis. This post-hoc analysis suggests that cariprazine may be associated with beneficial effects on measures of attention and QoL among patients with schizophrenia, and these effects could be more pronounced among individuals with PNS. • Cariprazine has previously demonstrated benefits on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. • This post-hoc analysis included a subgroup of people with schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms (PNS). • Analysis showed that cariprazine may be associated with benefit on measures of attention and quality of life. • Cariprazine's beneficial effects may be more pronounced among individuals with PNS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".