MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408251516 · doi:10.1016/j.accre.2025.02.008

Projection of sea ice conditions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago based on CMIP6 assessments

2025· article· en· W4408251516 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Zhang, Hailong Guo, Changsheng Chen, Weizeng Shao, Yi Zhou, Deshuai Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Climate Change Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsArchipelagoArcticClimatologyProjection (relational algebra)OceanographyThe arcticSea iceEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) includes the critical region of the Northwest Passage (NWP) and is one of the areas with the most severe sea ice conditions in the Arctic. Currently, studies on sea ice projections focusing on the CAA are limited. Furthermore, the prediction results for the CAA from different models based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) exhibit uncertainty due to the inter-model spread. This study evaluated the projected data for sea ice concentration (SIC) and thickness (SIT) within the CAA from 14 CMIP6 models for the period 2015–2022 under the SSP2-4.5 scenario based on the satellite and reanalysis data. Although most models can capture the major characteristics of spatiotemporal variations in SIC and SIT within the CAA, there are considerable numerical differences compared to observations and reanalysis. Additionally, there is a notable spread among 14 CMIP6 models. The assessment of SIC indicates that CESM2, GFDL-CM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, and UKESM1-0-LL exhibit better performance, with a relatively low bias (less than 7%), a root mean square error (RMSE) below 22%, and a relatively high correlation coefficient (CC) exceeding 0.75. In the evaluation of SIT, the four best-performing models are GFDL-CM4, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MPI-ESM1-2-LR, and MRI-ESM2-0. The multi-model ensemble of the best performance group (MMM BPG ) projects a declining trend in both sea ice area (SIA) and SIT for the CAA from 2025 to 2100, with respective trends of −0.21 × 10 5 km 2 per decade and −0.06 m per decade under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, and −0.56 × 10 5 km 2 per decade and −0.11 m per decade under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. Under both scenarios, the MMM BPG predicts a more notable reduction of sea ice in the NWP compared to the multi-model ensemble of all 14 models. Navigable conditions for the northern and southern routes are defined by SIA and SIT respectively, with each route’s SIA being less than 5% of its total area and the mean SIT being below 0.15 m. Based on the SIA threshold, under the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, MMM BPG projects that continuous annual navigability in the NWP, with at least three navigable months per year, will be achieved starting in 2060 and 2054, respectively. According to the SIT threshold, the MMM BPG projects that it will reach continuous annual navigability with at least one navigable month per year under both scenarios, starting in 2038 and 2036, respectively. This study enhances the understanding of CMIP6 model performance in projecting sea ice within the CAA and provides insights into future sea ice conditions in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Climate Change ResearchSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207