MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408251708 · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102507

microRNA-133a as an indicator of disease progression and treatment response in X-linked myotubular myopathy

2025· article· en· W4408251708 on OpenAlexafffund
Nika Maani, Dakota Gustafson, Peter B. MacDonald, Emanuela Pannia, Crizza Ching, Nesrin Sabha, Jason E. Fish, Matthew S. Alexander, James J. Dowling

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMyotubular Trust
KeywordsmicroRNAMyopathyDiseaseMedicineBiologyGeneticsPathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a rare pediatric neuromuscular disease caused by loss-of-function variants in myotubularin (MTM1 ). With novel therapies entering clinical trials, the discovery of robust biomarkers that reflect disease severity and therapeutic efficacy is critically required. Using high-throughput and directed approaches, we identified a decrease in miR-133a expression as a marker of XLMTM disease in skeletal muscle and plasma of a mouse model of XLMTM ( Mtm1 KO). miR-133a is a muscle-enriched non-coding RNA (myomiR) involved in muscle development and function and is implicated in the regulation of the XLMTM modifier gene DNM2 . miR-133a has emerged as both a treatment-effect biomarker and therapeutic candidate in other neuromuscular diseases. We demonstrate that miR-133a expression negatively correlates with disease severity in Mtm1 KO mice and is upregulated in response to treatments that improve DNM2 expression and/or significantly rescue XLMTM. Moreover, we show that miR-133a expression in treated Mtm1 KO mice positively correlates with treatment response and was shown to have high discrimination accuracy for XLMTM by linear discriminant analysis (79%–90%) and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC >0.80). These results support miR-133a as a robust, circulating biomarker that reflects disease severity and treatment response in XLMTM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic AcidsSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207