MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408252755 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109417

Potential deficit irrigation adaptation strategies under climate change for sustaining cotton production in hyper–arid areas

2025· article· en· W4408252755 on OpenAlex
Xiaoping Chen, Haibo Dong, Zhiming Qi, Dongwei GUI, Liwang Ma, Kelly R. Thorp, Robert W. Malone, Hao Wu, Bo Liu, Shaoyuan Feng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch in Cotton Cultivation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsAridDeficit irrigationIrrigationProduction (economics)Adaptation (eye)Climate changeEnvironmental scienceClimate change adaptationWater resource managementSemi-arid climateAgroforestryIrrigation managementEconomicsAgronomyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Affected by climate change and elevated atmospheric CO 2 levels, the efficacy of agricultural management practices is of particular concern in a hyper–arid area. The effects of future climate change on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and water productivity (WP) were assessed under deficit irrigation strategies in China’s southern Xinjiang region. A previously calibrated and validated RZWQM2 model simulated cotton production for two time periods ranging between 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, under automatic irrigation method based on crop plant available water, factorially combined with four irrigation levels (100 %, 80 %, 60 %, and 50 %). Weather data was obtained from ten general circulation models, and two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways were tested. Deficit irrigation under climate change showed a simulated decrease in water use and production of cotton compared to the baseline (1960–2019). For the 2061–2080 period, mean simulated seed cotton yields were 4.43, 4.44, 3.95 and 3.47 Mg ha –1 ( vs. baseline: 4.65, 4.40, 3.58, 2.63 Mg ha −1 ) with the 100 %, 80 %, 60 % and 50 % irrigation levels. A 3.4 %-28.6 % of decrease ( vs. baseline) in seed cotton yield was found under SSP585 scenario in 2081–2100. The 80 %PAW–based irrigation provided the highest WP of 12.8 kg m –3 and 8.4 kg m –3 for 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, respectively, comparing to the baseline WP of 0.82 kg m –3 . Under SSP585 for 2081–2100, the simulated WP declined from 0.19 kg m –3 at 100 % irrigation levels to 0.04 kg m –3 at 50 % irrigation levels. These projections suggests that adequate irrigation is the key to ensure cotton production and moderate deficit irrigation can be applied to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on cotton yield in a hyper–arid area. • Deficit irrigation reduced cotton yield by 3 %-38 % under climate change. • Deficit irrigation increased cotton water productivity by 4.8 %-12.8 % under SSP245 scenario. • Water productivity decreased by 8.5 %-22 % under SSP585 for the 2081–2100. • The optimal cotton water use was 479–500 mm under climate change in hyper–arid areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it