MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Extracellular vesicles in mood disorders: A systematic review of human studies

2025· review· en· W4408252979 on OpenAlexaff
Cristian-Daniel Llach, Gia Han Le, Sebastian Badulescu, Gerard Anmella, Hayder Ali Hasan, Anna Giménez‐Palomo, Isabella Pacchiarotti, Eduard Vieta, Roger S. McIntyre, Joshua D. Rosenblat, Rodrigo B. Mansur

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrain and Cognition Discovery FoundationUniversity Health Network
FundersFundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona
KeywordsExtracellular vesiclesMood disordersMoodPsychologyNeuroscienceClinical psychologyPsychiatryBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• EV studies target MDD, BD, postpartum, adolescent, and late-life depression. • EV cargo provides mechanistic insights and links to neuroimaging findings in MD. • EV-derived markers hold promise for diagnosis and treatment response in MD. • EV physical properties may offer additional clinical insights into MD. • Future research should prioritize brain-derived EVs and standardized methodologies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small, membrane-bound particles that are naturally released by nearly all cell types in the body. They serve as molecular biosignatures, reflecting the state of their cells of origin and providing a non-invasive peripheral marker of central nervous system (CNS) activity under physiological and pathological conditions. We conducted a systematic review (ID: CRD42024528824) of studies investigating the use of EVs in mood disorders within clinical populations. We screened articles indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and APA PsycInfo from January 2010 to October 2024. Available research has focused on four key areas: (1) EV cargo as mechanistic and diagnostic biomarkers; (2) EV cargo as predictive or tracking biomarkers for antidepressant response; (3) EV cargo and neuroimaging correlates; and (4) EV physical properties. Most studies examined major depressive disorder (MDD), with others addressing bipolar disorder (BD), adolescent depression, postpartum depression, and late-life depression. Notably, only 35,55 % of the studies utilized brain-derived EVs. Through analyses of EV-derived miRNA, proteins, mtDNA, and metabolites, these studies have explored neural mitochondrial function, brain insulin resistance, neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, and blood-brain barrier permeability in the context of mood disorders. Some EV-derived markers demonstrated diagnostic and predictive potential. This review discusses key findings, limitations of current research, and future directions for leveraging EVs in the study of mood disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0120.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207