MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408254159 · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3548236

rPPG Estimation: Vision Transformer With 3-D Temporal Central Difference

2025· article· en· W4408254159 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Salah, Philippe Jouvet, Rita Noumeir

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTransformerComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has gained increasing importance, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, for its ability to estimate heart rate (HR) by analyzing subtle variations in skin color without physical contact. This noninvasive and practical method relies on capturing changes in pixel intensity through RGB video or near-infrared imaging. In this study, we propose a novel hybrid model that leverages the feed-forward integration of 3-D convolutional neural networks (3-D-CNNs) and video vision transformers (ViViTs) to enhance rPPG estimation. The 3-D-CNNs first capture local spatiotemporal features, using temporal central difference convolution (3DCDC-T) and convolutional block attention module (CBAM). These local features are then passed to the ViViT, where multihead self-attention (MHSA) captures global contextual relationships and long-range dependencies across frames, enabling a more effective representation of complex temporal dynamics. This sequential learning allows the model to progressively refine features from local to global, ensuring more consistent and coherent feature extraction. Our feed-forward approach also improves computational efficiency by reducing the dimensionality of the input data before global attention processing, making it particularly effective in data-limited environments. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that our hybrid approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple public datasets, achieving a 22.55% improvement in mean absolute error (MAE) and a 55.80% improvement in root mean-squared error (RMSE) on the UBFC-rPPG dataset, demonstrating superior feature progression and generalization in rPPG and HR estimation tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207