Dynamic multicriteria optimization for the nurse scheduling problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This document addresses the Nurse Scheduling Problem (NSP) and presents a dynamic multi-criteria optimization model for its solution considering a predefined time horizon. The purpose is to maximize the level of "work well-being" of nurses formulated as the minimization of "aversion" which translates into costs or penalties for certain undesirable work shifts. For this, a series of criteria are defined to estimate the preference structure of nurses according to the hospital center specifications by assigning costs for undesirable shift assignments. The proposed methodology involves developing a heuristic to decompose the global problem into daily subproblems for which a dynamic algorithm is implemented that considers a cost accumulation process for all criteria and all nurses. Daily models are dynamically solved by modifying the coefficients of the well-being function to achieve equity throughout the planning period by updating and accumulating different averages. This methodology has shown satisfactory results for scheduling work shifts for doctors, paramedics, security guards, and drivers in numerous hospital centers in Colombia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it