MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408261412 · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2025.142019

Terahertz spectroscopy of CaH

2025· article· en· W4408261412 on OpenAlexaff
Jin Furuta, Kaori Kobayashi, Fusakazu Matsushima, Yoshiki Moriwaki, Hiroyuki Ozeki, Stephen C. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Physics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsTerahertz radiationSpectroscopyTerahertz spectroscopy and technologyMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Engineering physicsPhysicsOrganic chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcium monohydride, CaH, has been a molecule of astrophysical interest ever since its first identification in sunspots. For astrophysical use it is therefore important to provide rest frequencies in the terahertz range. We observed pure rotational transitions for the υ = 0, and υ = 1 levels. This is the first report of pure rotational spectra of the υ = 1 level. We also performed a global fitting of the effective molecular constants for the υ = 0 to υ = 4 levels of the electronic ground state along with infrared transitions from previous studies. • Pure rotational transitions of CaH (X 2 Σ + ) were observed in the 0.25–3.87 THz region. • N values up to 15 and 16 were seen in the υ = 0 and 1 vibrational states, respectively. • Molecular constants were determined for the lowest vibrational states of CaH (X 2 Σ + ). • Accurate transition rest frequencies are provided. • A global analysis including vibrational transitions was also carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Physics LettersSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207