Sociétés de migrations en débat. Québec-Canada-Suisse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage rassemble les travaux de chercheurs de différentes disciplines autour de la thématique de la migration. Il a pour but de faire converger et mettre en valeur des recherches récentes portant sur cette question au Québec, au Canada et en Suisse du XIXe au XXIe siècle. Interpellés par les débats récents surgis dans des sociétés très attentives aux questions identitaires liées à la migration, aux liens entre religion et politique noués autour de la laïcité, ainsi qu’à la tolérance entre communautés d’origines diverses, des spécialistes en sciences humaines se sont sentis incités à réfléchir aux enjeux propres aux migrations, hier comme aujourd’hui. Réunis par le Centre suisse d’Etudes sur le Québec et la Francophonie (CEQF), ces chercheurs suisses, français et québécois ont voulu répondre à cette demande sociale en prenant le recul nécessaire et en engageant la réflexion et le débat sur les questions touchant la migration, dans ses composantes socio-politiques, identitaires et culturelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".