MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408266482 · doi:10.2118/224013-ms

Enhancing Short-Term Oil Forecasting in SAGD Operations Using ARIMAX-GARCH and Bi-directional LSTM Models

2025· article· en· W4408266482 on OpenAlexaff
Vahid Dehdari, Mohammad Kariznovi, M. R. Tenove

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringEconometricsGeologyMathematicsVolatility (finance)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study focuses on enhancing short-term oil forecasting in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) operations by leveraging advanced ARIMAX-GARCH and Bi-directional LSTM models. SAGD, a vital method for bitumen extraction, involves injecting steam into the reservoir to facilitate oil production through gravity drainage. Conventional analytical models often fail to account for critical operational parameters, such as subcool, and lack the sensitivity required to capture short-term variations and distinct SAGD phases (Ramp-up, Plateau, and Decline). To address these limitations, this work introduces time series models—ARIMAX-GARCH and Bi-directional LSTM—designed to manage temporal dependencies, autocorrelation, and non-stationarity inherent in SAGD production data. Initially, the limitations of traditional machine learning techniques, such as regression and tree-based models, for forecasting challenging cases are highlighted. The performance of ARIMAX-GARCH and Bi-directional LSTM models is then evaluated, showcasing their respective strengths. Bi-directional LSTM is one of the most common time series modeling approaches, but the focus of this paper is on the ARIMAX-GARCH approach. For some test cases, the two methods are compared, demonstrating that for short-term forecasting applications, ARIMAX-GARCH consistently produces better results with significantly shorter training times. The ARIMAX-GARCH model effectively forecasts both the mean and variance of the time series, addressing volatility and uncertainty, while the Bi-directional LSTM excels at capturing complex temporal relationships and uncovering hidden patterns. In this case, ARIMAX-GARCH provided sufficient accuracy for short-term forecasting. In this paper, short-term forecasting refers to a maximum period of 3 years. Finally, the study introduces a novel hybrid methodology that combines ARIMAX-GARCH and Bi-directional LSTM, where ARIMAX-GARCH predicts the linear trends and variance, while Bi-directional LSTM models the residual non-linear patterns. The forecasts are aggregated to improve accuracy and robustness, enhancing the prediction of production rates during different SAGD operational phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→