MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408279863 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.03.641339

Prenatal DEHP plastic chemical exposure increases the likelihood of child autism and ADHD symptoms through epigenetic programming

2025· preprint· en· W4408279863 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Tanner, Alex Eisner, Boris Novakovic, Toby Mansell, Gillian England-Mason, Sarah M. Merrill, Deborah Dewey, Martin O’Hely, Christos Symeonides, Richard Saffery, Jochen F. Mueller, Mimi L.K. Tang, Peter D. Sly, Peter Vuillermin, Chol-Hee Jung, Daniel Park, Anne‐Louise Ponsonby

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutismEpigeneticsPrenatal exposureFetal programmingPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPregnancyBiologyGeneticsFetusGestationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Increasing evidence implicates prenatal exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a common endocrine-disrupting plastic chemical, in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we examined whether cord blood DNA methylation, a key epigenetic marker, mediates the association between prenatal DEHP exposure and ASD/ADHD symptoms in 847 children enrolled in the Barwon Infant Study. ASD and ADHD are complex phenotypes characterised by differences at the gene regulatory network and neuronal circuit level, where heterogeneous genetic and environmental risk factors converge. Accordingly, we employed a data-driven computational strategy that helped elucidate broader functional epigenetic signatures of ASD and ADHD elicited by DEHP exposure. This included (1) a methylation profile score for DEHP exposure (MPS DEHP ), and (2) an analysis of co-methylated gene networks. Causal mediation analysis demonstrated that both MPS DEHP and a DEHP-associated network of co-methylated genes mediated the effect of DEHP exposure on increased ASD and ADHD symptoms at ages 2 and 4 years (proportion of effect mediated ranged from 0.21 to 0.80). The co-methylation network was enriched for neural cell-type markers, ASD risk genes (including FOXP1 , SHANK2, and PLXNB1 ), and targets of endocrine receptors previously linked to DEHP (including targets of the estrogen receptor ERα and the glucocorticoid receptor GR), providing biological plausibility. We validated key results in independent blood (n=66) and postmortem brain (n=40) DNA methylation datasets. These findings provide mechanistic evidence linking DEHP to ASD and ADHD symptoms and reinforce growing concerns regarding the risks of prenatal exposure. Significance Exposure to endocrine-disrupting plastic chemicals has been linked to adverse neurodevelopment, but the underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. We demonstrate that prenatal exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a common plasticizer, increases autism and ADHD symptoms through alterations in DNA methylation, a key epigenetic regulator of gene activity. Using birth cohort data, we identify epigenetic signatures of prenatal DEHP exposure, including alterations in an endocrine-related co-methylation network enriched for neural cell-type markers and known autism-associated genes. These signatures mediate the effects of DEHP on autism and ADHD symptoms and are also associated with autism in external blood and postmortem-brain datasets, providing independent validation. This causal evidence further underscores concerns regarding the consequences of prenatal plastic-chemical exposure on the developing brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→