MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408280760 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3546741

A Three-Point Interpolation DFT-Based Frequency Estimation Algorithm for Temperature-Stable System in MEMS Oscillators

2025· article· en· W4408280760 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Tang, Bin Wei, Kai Wang, Zhenhao Hu, Xusheng Tang, Yinfang Zhu, Zeyu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Microelectromechanical systemsPoint (geometry)Temperature measurementAlgorithmStability (learning theory)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringMathematicsMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringOptoelectronicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) oscillators are widely used in navigation systems because of their reliability. Real-time temperature changes will have a major impact on the stability of these systems, so calculating the output frequency of the MEMS resonator at different temperatures is particularly important for the stability of the system. Therefore, we propose a three-point interpolated discrete Fourier transform (IpDFT)-based frequency estimation algorithm for a temperature-stable system in MEMS oscillators. Because the temperature-stable technique can provide an unbiased estimate of the frequency of the signal that is more accurate and efficient for temperature compensation, it can effectively mitigate the frequency shift of the MEMS resonator due to temperature variation. The simulated result of the absolute temperature error is less than$0.01~^{\circ } $C when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 40 dB. The absolute temperature error result is less than$0.01~^{\circ } $C in the amplitude jitter and frequency jitter tests. The temperature-stable technique is applied to the MEMS resonator temperature compensation system. The measured frequency shift ratio of the signal processed by the temperature compensation system is less than 30 ppm, indicating that the oscillation frequency can be effectively stabilized at different temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207