MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Variable Switching Frequency Modulation for Wide ZVS Range in Y-Inverter Using Adaptive Deadtime

2024· article· en· W4408281423 on OpenAlexaff
Sadra Tavakolian, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterFrequency modulationModulation (music)Variable (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringSwitching frequencyControl theory (sociology)PhysicsMaterials scienceRadio frequencyTelecommunicationsMathematicsVoltageAcousticsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing the efficiency in buck-boost Y-voltage source inverter (Y-VSI) can happen by reducing the switching losses. This paper proposes a new soft-switching method to achieve minimum switching losses in Y-VSI. First, switching inductor current boundaries are found using the current equation in both buck and boost chopping operation. To minimize the required deadtime for capacitor discharging between turn on and turn off of the switches, an adaptive deadtime is calculated for both lower and upper boundaries of the inductor current. Using calculated deadtime for turn on and turn off in the switches, variable frequency pulse width modulation (PWM) signals are used to achieve full zero voltage switching (ZVS) range for both buck side and boost side switches in Y-VSI. Simulation results verify that the proposed ZVS method increases efficiency more than %2 in a 5 kW SJ-based Y-VSI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207