A Real-time Monitoring Architecture for Enhanced Cybersecurity in the EV Ecosystem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric Vehicles (EV) have experienced a tremendous rise in popularity as they offer a sustainable alternative to conventional vehicles. However, the EV ecosystem is a complex system consisting of many interconnected components such as the EV Charging Station (CS) and the EV Charging Station Management System (CSMS). Given its connection to the smart grid and its direct impact on the transportation sector, securing the EV ecosystem is essential and requires the design of novel monitoring solutions. Previous studies proposed single-component detection mechanisms that cannot detect all potential anomalies across the system. Our work addresses this issue through the combination and correlation of monitoring data collected from the different EV ecosystem components. Our objective is to develop a real-time monitoring platform for attack detection in the public EV charging ecosystem that is based on the extension of the IEC 62351-7:2017 Network and System Management (NSM) standard. By adopting an international security standard, we ensure the monitoring platform is compatible with international power systems. To validate the utility of the approach, we integrate the monitoring framework with a real-time EV charging cosimulation testbed and discuss how it can be used to detect EV-based cyberattacks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".