MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling and Model Predictive Control of a 7-Level Packed U-Cell Converter for Grid-Tied PV Applications

2024· article· en· W4408281980 on OpenAlexafffund
Raghda Hariri, Fadia Sebaaly, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Hadi Y. Kanaan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureHydro-Québec
FundersNational Council for Scientific ResearchAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsModel predictive controlGridGrid cellControl (management)Computer sciencePhotovoltaic systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a novel 7-Level Packed U-Cell (PUC) converter with Model Predictive Controller (MPC) for solar grid-tied applications is presented. The excellence of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels as an interface application in producing green power for utility is examined by the proposed topology. Our innovation represents a novel attempt to use PV solar panels incorporated with PUC converter in its two DC links rather than just one. The designed model's primary advantage is its overall reduced complexity design compared with other existing topologies. Hence, no additional controller other than MPC—such as a PI controller—is needed to extract grid reference current, Additionally, since the utilized Perturbation and Observation (P&O) technology directly controls the provided power, no DC-DC booster converter is needed while integrating PV solar panels to the PUC converter. To assess and verify the proposed concept's performance, Matlab/Simulink simulations were run. However, to verify the suggested topology's robustness and dynamic response, it was tested in steady state condition and under other various types of sudden disturbances. The system demonstrates resilience to changes in grid voltage, phase shift and irradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207