MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ZPUC-MMC: Real-Time Implementation with Model Predictive Control

2024· article· en· W4408282166 on OpenAlexaff
Fadia Sebaaly, Rawad Zgheib, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModel predictive controlControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With reduced number of components count, Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) based on ZPUC converter can generate a higher number of voltage levels when compared to well-known topologies. However, the capacitors voltage balancing of ZPUC topology remains a challenge when operating as a submodule due to the high number of capacitor’s voltages to be regulated at the same time in each submodule. This becomes more complicated when several submodules operate and when no self voltage balancing can be achieved such the case of seven-level ZPUC (7L-ZPUC) converter. For this reason, Model Predictive Control (MPC), well known of its superiority in achieving multiple control objectives and superior dynamic performance is introduced in this paper as a controller for the MMC converter based 7L-ZPUC. A Finite Set Model Predictive Control method (FS-MPC) is designed to control a three-phase grid-connected MMC. The proposed FS-MPC is designed to generate thirteen-level output phase voltage and 25-level line-to-line voltages. A detailed real-time model of the converter and its suggested controller is developed and implemented in the real-time simulation software Hypersim to validate the effectiveness of the proposed predictive control. Real-time implementation results verify and demonstrate the good performance of the overall Software In the Loop (SIL) application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207