No significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes evolution after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee between patients with pathological and non‐pathological scores regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative psychological factors on clinical outcomes of fresh osteochondral allograft (FOCA) transplantation of the knee. The hypothesis was that patients with preoperative pathological scores on psychological factors would show worsen functional outcomes after FOCA transplantation of the knee. Methods: A prospective data collection study was performed from patients undergoing FOCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the knee. All patients were followed up for 30 months. Psychological factors of anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing were assessed by means of self-administered Hospital Anxiety and Depression Subscale (HADS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaires one week prior to surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 30 months postoperatively using the Kujala score, the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner Activity Scale. Participants were classified as pathological or non-pathological scores for each psychological parameter in accordance with the cut-off point proposed by the authors of each questionnaire. The interaction between clinical outcome's evolution and pathological scores was analysed using two-way ANOVA tests with Greenhouse-Geisser correction to avoid non-sphericity errors. Results: > 0.05) regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the evolution of postoperative clinical outcomes between patients with pathological and non-pathological psychological scores. Level of Evidence: Level III, case series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".